ArticleScientific reports2025
Impact of AZFc deletion subtypes on sperm retrieval rates via micro-TESE and ICSI outcomes in non-obstructive azoospermia patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Seminal-Plasma Molecular Biomarkers as a Liquid Biopsy of Testicular Function: Toward AI-Ready Sperm-Retrieval Prediction in Non-Obstructive Azoospermia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to compare the sperm retrieval rate (SRR) achieved through microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) with the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) who exhibit a partial deletion of the azoospermia factor c(AZFc) region on the Y chromosome. From December 2016 to September 2023, the clinical data of patients with NOA who had AZFc deletions, which were identified through high-throughput sequencing, and who underwent micro-TESE were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the results of screening the AZFc region, the patients were categorized into three groups-the gr/gr deletion group (n = 17), the b2/b4 deletion group (n = 62), and the b2/b3 deletion group (n = 11). The SRR, embryo development, and embryo transfer outcomes were compared between the three groups. The SRR in the gr/gr deletion group was significantly lower than that in the b2/b4 deletion group (P = 0.010). Conversely, the SRR in the b2/b4 deletion group and b2/b3 deletion group were relatively high, at 64.5% (40/62) and 54.5(6/11),respectively; however, the number of micro-TESE procedures that extracted sperm with severe morphological abnormalities was 13, resulting in an available sperm rate of only 43.5% (27/62). No significant differences were observed across all groups regarding fertilized oocyte (2PN) rate, 2PN cleavage rate, D3 available embryo rate, high-quality embryo rate, blastocyst formation rate, number of transferred embryos, miscarriage rate, clinical pregnancy rate, or live birth delivery rate (P > 0.05). The micro-TESE outcomes in NOA patients with partial deletions in the AZFc region of the Y chromosome are most significantly negatively impacted by gr/gr deletion.Patients with b2/b4 deletion and b2/b3 deletion type should actively undergo surgical treatment to obtain biological descendants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.