Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40595904›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A spherical fuzzy WASPAS approach to prioritize the factors enhancing the effectiveness of physical education classroom teaching.

Yuhan Gao, Ali Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuhan GaoGandong University, Fuzhou, 344000, Jiangxi, China. Yh953486938@163.com.
Ali YuJiangxi Science and Technology Normal University, Nanchang, 330000, Jiangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhancing the effectiveness of physical education (PE) classroom teaching is critical to fostering students' physical, mental, and social development. When assessing the alternatives for enhancing PE teaching in connection with multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM), the necessary criteria include the engagement level of the learner, cost control, and distribution of the resources. However, MCDM methods used in the past suffer from some limitations, such as uncertainty, vagueness, and subjectivity of experts' opinions, which leads to inefficient decision-making information. These limitations complicate identifying which approaches will help improve teaching practices in the PE classroom. To tackle these challenges, this paper employs the spherical fuzzy weighted aggregated sum product assessment (SF-WASPAS) method, which integrates spherical fuzzy sets (SFSs) to handle uncertainty and hesitancy that could be present in experts' opinions to enhance the evaluation method. The study evaluates alternatives such as teacher training programs, allocation of resources, incorporation of new methodologies, and better classroom discipline based on various criteria, including student engagement, cost, ease of integration, spread ability, and the effects on students' learning. The results of the SF-WASPAS method show that the top-ranked alternative is better classroom discipline, which offers the highest potential for enhancing PE classroom teaching. The findings of this study provide valuable insights for educators and policymakers, facilitating informed decision-making for optimizing resource utilization, improving teaching strategies, and enhancing student learning outcomes in PE classrooms.

Indexed as

Classroom teachingDecision algorithmPhysical educationSpherical fuzzy WASPAS techniqueWeight prioritization

Identifiers

PMID40595904
PMCPMC12215458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.