ArticleScientific reports2025
An explainable federated blockchain framework with privacy-preserving AI optimization for securing healthcare data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current status and future outlook of artificial intelligence and automation in intravenous infusion systems.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Integration of Federated Learning and Blockchain in Health Care: Tutorial on Medical Data, Architectures, Privacy, Security, and Regulatory Compliance.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and multi-omics integration in liquid biopsy for genitourinary cancers: a systematic scoping review.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Federated learning with continual update for privacy-preserving clinical event prediction across distributed hospitals using MCN-GNN.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- DBH-Chain: a decentralized blockchain-enabled healthcare framework for end-to-end delay optimization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A robust and verifiable federated learning framework for preventing data poisonous threats in e-health.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- A federated incremental blockchain framework with privacy preserving XAI optimization for securing healthcare data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- IBS-ECDHE: A blockchain-enhanced lightweight protocol for secure cloud-IoT in biomedical HCPS.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rapid growth of healthcare data and the need for secure, interpretable, and decentralized machine learning systems, Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a promising solution. However, FL models often face challenges regarding privacy preservation, transparency, and resistance to adversarial attacks. To address these limitations, this paper proposes the Privacy Preserving Federated Blockchain Explainable Artificial Intelligence Optimization (PPFBXAIO) framework, which integrates blockchain technology, Explainable AI (XAI), and optimization techniques to ensure privacy, traceability, and robustness in FL-based systems. PPFBXAIO employs Secure Hash Algorithm 256 (SHA-256) for blockchain-backed secure model updates, Min-Max normalization for feature scaling, and the Levy Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (LGOA) for optimal feature selection and federated model tuning. The Entropy Deep Belief Network (EDBN) is used as the classifier to enhance classification accuracy and detect attacks. XAI tools like SHAP are utilized to improve model interpretability. Experimental validation was conducted using the Heart Disease dataset from Kaggle and the Wisconsin Breast Cancer dataset. Results showed that PPFBXAIO achieved 95.07% accuracy, 95.44% precision, 96.54% recall, 95.98% F1 score, and reduced training loss by 4.93% for Breast Cancer Wisconsin and achieved 93.07% accuracy, 91.19% precision, 95.39% recall, 93.24% F1 score for Heart Disease dataset. Proposed system has reduced latency by 81 ms, and improved throughput by 109 transactions per second for 100 rounds as compared to traditional models like FedAvg, FL-MPC, FL-RAEC, and PEFL. These results highlight the framework's superior performance, privacy preservation, and practical applicability in decentralized healthcare AI systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.