Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40595846›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Unravelling root system architecture plasticity in response to abiotic stresses in maize.

Garudapalya Muniswamy Keerthi, Mallana Gowdra Mallikarjuna, Shilendra Kumar Jha, Rakesh Pandey, Palanisamy Veeraya, Hirenallur Chandappa Lohithaswa, Viswanathan Chinnusamy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Garudapalya Muniswamy KeerthiDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Mallana Gowdra MallikarjunaDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India. mgrpatil@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4565-9792
Shilendra Kumar JhaDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Rakesh PandeyDivision of Plant Physiology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Palanisamy VeerayaDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Hirenallur Chandappa LohithaswaUniversity of Agricultural Sciences, GKVK, Bengaluru, 560065, India.
Viswanathan ChinnusamyDivision of Plant Physiology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.

Funding

Indian Council of Agricultural Research Agril.Edn.14(44)/2014-A&P
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays L.) production is often limited by edaphic stresses, viz., drought, salinity and nutrient deficiencies. The root system architecture (RSA) in is essential for efficient water and nutrient acquisition and overall plant stability under adverse conditions. Thus, identifying maize genotypes with desirable root characteristics under stress is a valuable strategy for breeding maize with enhanced abiotic stress tolerance and improved resource-use efficiency. The hydroponics-based root phenotyping offers control over the root environment, reduced labour, and almost damage-free phenotyping over field-based phenotyping. Here, we have investigated the adaptive RSA plasticity of maize under drought, low nitrogen, salinity, and non-stress environments. The results revealed significant variability for all the RSA-associated and related traits. The salinity-stressed genotypes showed adaptive plasticity with enhanced average root diameter (AD), whereas the enhanced total root length (TRL) and surface area (SA) were reduced along with average root diameter under low-N stress. The RSA traits TRL (total root length), SA (surface area), RV (root volume), SFW (shoot fresh weight), SDW (shoot dry weight), RFW (root fresh weight) and RDW (root dry weight) showed positive and significant correlations across the stress conditions (0.47 to 0.99; p < 0.001 to 0.05). Conversely, AD showed significantly negative correlations with SRL (-0.70 to -0.95; p < 0.001) of genotypes, stress (environment) and genotypes × stress (environment) interactions suggested the possibility of developing stress-specific maize cultivars by selecting inbred lines with high adaptive plasticity to specific stress environments or broad adaptability by selecting lines with high stability across stress environments. The results suggested that the maize RSA adapts not only specific root types and traits to cope with various environmental stress conditions but also the strength and directions of trait association. Notably, inbreds SKV671 and CML597 exhibited superior performance for various RSA traits under drought and low nitrogen conditions, while PML93 and MG42 excelled in salinity stress.

Indexed as

Plant RootsStress, PhysiologicalZea maysAdaptation, PhysiologicalDroughtsGenotypeNitrogenPhenotypeSalinityNitrogenDroughtLow-nitrogenMaizePlasticityRoot systemSalinity

Identifiers

PMID40595846
PMCPMC12216579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.