ArticleScientific reports2025
The role of spontaneous and evoked neuronal activity in protection from impending ischemic stroke during the hyperacute state.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Using an ischemic stroke rat model by applying permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion (pMCAo), we have previously demonstrated that protection of the ischemic territory can be achieved by providing intermittent sensory stimulation within a period of 2 h following the occlusion. Beyond this period, sensory stimulation becomes deleterious and results in infarct. We have further demonstrated that such sensory-based protection depends on the integrative role of activated synapses, activated neurons, activated astrocytes, and activated blood vessels. By using the same rat pMCAo model for the current study, we hypothesized that all such activations are potentially triggered by sensory stimulation-based evoked neuronal activity within the ischemic cortex, that in turn triggers the various activations that lead to protection. To test this hypothesis, we used functional imaging and postmortem histology and selectively blocked spontaneous or evoked neuronal activity within the ischemic territory by local administration of lidocaine. Our findings demonstrate that the ischemic cortex is extremely sensitive, as clear functional blockage at the site of lidocaine diffusion and a corresponding infarct at the same location were found for both spontaneous activity and sensory-based evoked activity. Furthermore, the extreme sensitivity of the ischemic cortex is demonstrated by the detrimental effects of phosphate buffer saline (PBS) application if protective sensory-based stimulation is not present following pMCAo. We conclude that neuronal activity, either spontaneous or evoked, within the ischemic cortex is pivotal for protection during the early hyperacute phase of ischemic stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.