Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40595837›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Biased birth sex ratios of mammals and birds in zoos.

Oscar G Miranda, Fernando Colchero, José O Valdebenito, Diego Cortez, Dalia A Conde, Ivett Pipoly, András Liker, Balázs Vági, Mads F Bertelsen, Albus Kilili and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Oscar G MirandaHUN-REN-DE Reproductive Strategies Research Group, Department of Evolutionary Zoology and Human Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary. oscar.garcia.miranda@unideb.hu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4220-2957
Fernando ColcheroDepartment of Primate Behavior and Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8613-4568
José O ValdebenitoFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Agronomía, Universidad de Las Américas, Campus Concepción, Concepción, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6709-6305
Diego CortezCentro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Morelos, México.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0654-6349
Dalia A CondeDepartment of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7923-8163
Ivett PipolyBehavioural Ecology Research Group, Center for Natural Sciences, University of Pannonia, Veszprém, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4541-6056
András LikerBehavioural Ecology Research Group, Center for Natural Sciences, University of Pannonia, Veszprém, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8545-4869
Balázs VágiHUN-REN-DE Reproductive Strategies Research Group, Department of Evolutionary Zoology and Human Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0469-6784
Mads F BertelsenCopenhagen Zoo, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9201-7499
Albus KililiDepartment of Life Sciences, Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Bath, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4160-5888
Araxi O UrrutiaDepartment of Life Sciences, Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Bath, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9011-8675
Tamás SzékelyHUN-REN-DE Reproductive Strategies Research Group, Department of Evolutionary Zoology and Human Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary. T.Szekely@bath.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2093-0056

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Birth sex ratio biases can amplify extinction risks, especially in small, zoo-maintained populations which is of particular concern in species under threat of extinction. Thus, understanding the drivers of such biases is critical for conservation outcomes. We analysed birth records from 129 avian and 324 mammalian species in zoos worldwide between 1980 and 2021. Using Bayesian phylogenetic models, we found a phylogenetic signal in birth sex ratios (BSR), with substantial variation across clades. Penguins, falcons, and parrots showed slightly male-biased BSRs; ungulates showed female-biased BSR, and primates male-biased BSR. Across birds, variation in BSRs was predicted by sexual size dimorphism and clutch size, whereas in mammals, mating system was the main predictor of BSR. We identified 30 conservation flagship species with significantly biased BSRs, raising concern for the demographic sustainability of their captive populations. These results highlight the role of both evolutionary history and life-history traits in shaping sex ratio variation across taxa. Our findings underscore the importance of integrating phylogenetic and biological predictors into conservation planning and breeding program design. They also call for further research into the biological and management processes-that include sexual selection, parental investment, housing, and sexing practices-that may contribute to sex ratio variation in zoo populations.

Indexed as

Animals, ZooBirdsMammalsSex RatioAnimalsBayes TheoremConservation of Natural ResourcesFemaleMalePhylogenyBiodiversityConservationEvolutionary ecologyMating systemsSex allocationSexual dimorphismZoo management

Identifiers

PMID40595837
PMCPMC12219785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.