ArticleScientific reports2025
Biased birth sex ratios of mammals and birds in zoos.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adult Sex Ratio as a Demographic Feedback Linking Mating Systems, Parental Care, and Evolution.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Birth sex ratio biases can amplify extinction risks, especially in small, zoo-maintained populations which is of particular concern in species under threat of extinction. Thus, understanding the drivers of such biases is critical for conservation outcomes. We analysed birth records from 129 avian and 324 mammalian species in zoos worldwide between 1980 and 2021. Using Bayesian phylogenetic models, we found a phylogenetic signal in birth sex ratios (BSR), with substantial variation across clades. Penguins, falcons, and parrots showed slightly male-biased BSRs; ungulates showed female-biased BSR, and primates male-biased BSR. Across birds, variation in BSRs was predicted by sexual size dimorphism and clutch size, whereas in mammals, mating system was the main predictor of BSR. We identified 30 conservation flagship species with significantly biased BSRs, raising concern for the demographic sustainability of their captive populations. These results highlight the role of both evolutionary history and life-history traits in shaping sex ratio variation across taxa. Our findings underscore the importance of integrating phylogenetic and biological predictors into conservation planning and breeding program design. They also call for further research into the biological and management processes-that include sexual selection, parental investment, housing, and sexing practices-that may contribute to sex ratio variation in zoo populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.