ArticleScientific reports2025
Predictive quality of census-based socio-economic indicators on Covid-19 infection risk at a fine spatial scale in France.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic in France induced the development of a national, high spatiotemporal resolution confirmed infection cases database. We aimed to estimate the predictive ability of census-based indicators on the infection risk to assess their potential usefulness in future pandemic response. We collected and aggregated all counts of biologically confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region in France at small-area statistical units between May 2020 and February 2021 (second wave). Ten census-based ecological covariates were evaluated as predictors of case incidence using a Poisson regression with conditional autoregressive (CAR) spatial effects. Benefits of CAR effects and covariates on model predictive ability was assessed comparing posterior predictive distribution of case incidence with the observed value for each statistical unit. Among 7,917,997 inhabitants, 438,992 infection cases over 5410 neighbourhoods were analysed. Spatial correlation was high for the periods before and after the epidemic peak, and illustrated with cartography. The addition of covariates to the null model led to an increase in satisfying prediction of + 5% from 14%, with a maximum of 21% across all periods. The ecological covariates assessed were insufficient to provide a satisfying prediction of infection risk without explicitly accounting for the spatial organization of the epidemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.