ArticleScientific reports2025
Attention residual network for medical ultrasound image segmentation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CAFrontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrasound imaging can distinctly display the morphology and structure of internal organs within the human body, enabling the examination of organs like the breast, liver, and thyroid. It can identify the locations of tumors, nodules, and other lesions, thereby serving as an efficacious tool for treatment detection and rehabilitation evaluation. Typically, the attending physician is required to manually demarcate the boundaries of lesion locations, such as tumors, in ultrasound images. Nevertheless, several issues exist. The high noise level in ultrasound images, the degradation of image quality due to the impact of surrounding tissues, and the influence of the operator's experience and proficiency on the determination of lesion locations can all contribute to a reduction in the accuracy of delineating the boundaries of lesion sites. In the wake of the advancement of deep learning, its application in medical image segmentation is becoming increasingly prevalent. For instance, while the U-Net model has demonstrated a favorable performance in medical image segmentation, the convolution layers of the traditional U-Net model are relatively simplistic, leading to suboptimal extraction of global information. Moreover, due to the significant noise present in ultrasound images, the model is prone to interference. In this research, we propose an Attention Residual Network model (ARU-Net). By incorporating residual connections within the encoder section, the learning capacity of the model is enhanced. Additionally, a spatial hybrid convolution module is integrated to augment the model's ability to extract global information and deepen the vertical architecture of the network. During the feature fusion stage of the skip connections, a channel attention mechanism and a multi-convolutional self-attention mechanism are respectively introduced to suppress noisy points within the fused feature maps, enabling the model to acquire more information regarding the target region. Finally, the predictive efficacy of the model was evaluated using publicly accessible breast ultrasound and thyroid ultrasound data. The ARU-Net achieved mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) values of 82.59% and 84.88%, accuracy values of 97.53% and 96.09%, and F1-score values of 90.06% and 89.7% for breast and thyroid ultrasound, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.