ArticleScientific reports2025
A methodology for designing accurate, modifiable and reproducible scientific graphics in environmental studies using GPT4Designer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of text-to-image generation capabilities within GPT-4 allows for the convenient creation of various graphics. However, the proficiency of GPT-4 in crafting challenging scientific visuals remains largely unexplored. In this study, we conduct systematic experiments by employing multiple prompt engineering techniques with various supplementary materials to generate complex scientific illustrations for environmental studies. The locally enhanced electric field treatment for water disinfection is used as an example to illustrate the universal reflection of GPT-4 in graphic creation. From the experiments, we summarize that the existing prompt methods struggle in accuracy, modifiability, and reproducibility for scientific image generation. Based on the findings and insights drawn from the extensive experimental results, we develop GPT4Designer, a framework intended to generate scientific images without tedious prompt modifications. Specifically, a simple but surprisingly effective "envision-first" strategy by combining detailed prompting and guided envisioning is developed in the GPT4Designer framework. This strategy yields images with consistent styles aligned with the initial envisioning, significantly improving modifiability. Besides, by refining the conceptualization phase, we achieve much better control over the output, resulting in both high accuracy and reproducibility. This advancement is not only crucial for environmental scientists seeking to quickly produce engaging and accurate visuals (e.g., with only one step), but also demonstrates the existence "chain-of-thought" in image generation, which can inspire more works on the creative application of text-to-image generation models or tools.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.