ArticleScientific reports2025
Temporal acuity of vision decreases with eccentricity in virtual reality and is associated with schizotypy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating developmental changes in susceptibility to temporal audiovisual illusions on balance and sensorimotor function in children.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Spatial but not temporal orienting of attention enhances the temporal acuity of human peripheral vision.Communications psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Temporal acuity reflects our ability to consciously detect a perceptual change within a short period of time, such as an asynchrony separating two visual events. In this virtual reality study, fifty participants performed a simultaneity judgment task to estimate temporal acuity across the visual field and filled the schizotypal personality questionnaire. Topographic maps were computed to visualize asynchrony discrimination skills across the visual space in two different (natural and artificial) static virtual environments. We investigate visual temporal acuity in periphery, and how estimates of temporal acuity in a psychophysical-like setting translates into a naturalistic-like scenario. First, the temporal acuity of vision decreases as the eccentricity of the targets increases, but it remains constant across meridians. Second, this deterioration of temporal coding in peripheral vision concerns non-medicated individuals self-reporting perceptual and cognitive schizotypal traits. Third, temporal acuity estimated in a traditional psychophysical visual context does not generalize to an ecologically-valid landscape scenery, such that asynchrony discrimination skills are reduced under natural vision conditions. The results suggest that distinct temporal mechanisms drive visual temporal acuity in central and peripheral vision. Furthermore, perceptual and cognitive disturbances in the neurotypical population may be linked to abnormal temporal processing in peripheral vision. Overall, these findings may pave the way toward novel investigations into the variety of time experiences across neurotypical and neurodivergent populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.