ArticleScientific reports2025
Characterization of the secondary structure, renaturation and physical ageing of gelatine adhesives.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Waste to Function: Valorization of Collagen-Based Wastes with Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents for Bioadhesive Applications.ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering · 2026Article
- Natural Bio-Sourced Additives for Bread Technology Improvement and Highly Nutritive Products.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative effects of hydrophobic cellulose I and Ⅱ nanocrystals on the physicochemical properties of gelatin-based films for oil packaging.Current research in food science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Animal glues have been used since antiquity, but their popularity decreased in the twentieth century with the rise of synthetic adhesives. Currently they are primarily used in restoration of works of art. This study focuses on animal glue samples derived from bone and hide tissues used mainly for veiling and carpentry applications, examining their secondary structure, thermal and rheological properties, to shed light into their adhesive behaviour. Thermogravimetric analysis and differential scanning calorimetry highlight differences between hide and bone glues, showing that the latter are more hydrolysed. The calorimetric curves show varying values of denaturation enthalpy thus indicating a varying degree of gelatine renaturation. Additionally, the calorimetric analysis demonstrates the physical ageing of the glue samples, which is known to play a key role in maintaining their adhesive properties under specific storage conditions. The rheological data provide fundamental information on properties which are relevant for the use of animal glues as adhesives in various applications. XRD data suggest a low structural order in the samples investigated, where the amorphous component complicates the univocal interpretation of the spectra. FTIR reveal a relatively high content of β-structures in all commercial glue samples, as well as gelatine and collagen standards. Moreover, spectra of the glue films dried for 1 week show that the β-structures are recovered following dissolution in water and application. Therefore, β-structures seem crucial to explain the structure-dependent mechanical properties observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.