Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40595734›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Kirschner wire as an effective localization tool in UBE discectomy: enhancing segmental localization accuracy and optimizing decompression margins.

Changwei Yang, Guangzhu Yan, Kai Luo, Mingyuan Yang, Maoning Fang, Xiaolong Li, Yushu Bai, Qiulin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Changwei Yang *Department of Orthopaedics, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Guangzhu Yan *Department of Orthopaedics, Danyang Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Danyang, Jiangsu, China.
Kai Luo *Department of Orthopaedics, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Mingyuan Yang *Department of Orthopaedics, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Maoning FangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaolong LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China. lixl868@163.com.
Yushu BaiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China. baiyushu@21cn.com.
Qiulin ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Changhai Hospital, Navy Medical University, Shanghai, China. zhangqiulin@189.cn.

Funding

Shanghai Yiyuan Xinxing Youth Medical Talent Development and Funding Program SHWSRS(2025)_071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) surgery is an innovative minimally invasive technique for treating lumbar disc herniation. However, conventional surgical positioning, which combines preoperative surface localization with intraoperative fluoroscopy, has several limitations, including suboptimal accuracy, procedural complexity, and reduced operative efficiency. Additionally, incomplete decompression and over-decompression are common issues in UBE surgery, might leading to disastrous outcomes. However, determining the extent of laminectomy remain a significant challenge. This study explores the use of Kirschner Wire as a localization tool in UBE surgery to enhance localization precision and the the appropriate decompression range. This study included 78 patients diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and radicular pain who underwent UBE discectomy using Kirschner Wires as a localization tool. Another 73 patients with LDH underwent standard UBE discectomy without Kirschner Wires. We compared demographic data, surgical variables, postoperative complications, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) between the two groups. Incorrect segmental localization occurred in 2 patients in the Kirschner Wire group and 11 patients in the standard UBE discectomy group, indicating a significant difference. The Kirschner Wire group demonstrated shorter total operation time, less time spent identifying the correct segment, fewer instances of radiology exposure, and reduced intraoperative blood loss. Additionally, less paraspinal muscle injury was observed in the Kirschner Wire group. Incomplete decompression was identified in 4 patients in the standard UBE discectomy group, all of whom required revision surgery, whereas no cases of incomplete decompression were observed in the Kirschner Wire group. The incidence of facet injury was higher in the standard UBE discectomy group due to the over-decompression. However, no significant differences were found between the groups in terms of dural tear, root injury, incision infection, and revision surgery. Both groups showed improvements in visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back pain, VAS scores for leg pain, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), with a more significant decrease in leg pain VAS scores observed in the Kirschner Wire group. Kirschner Wire is an effective localization tool in UBE discectomy, providing accurate segmental localization and aiding surgeons in determining the extent of laminectomy for decompression, thus reducing the likelihood of incomplete decompression or over-decompression. Additionally, the use of Kirschner Wire can decrease total operation time, radiation exposure, intraoperative blood loss, and paraspinal muscle injury. We recommend Kirschner Wire as localization tools in UBE discectomy to enhance surgical precision and outcomes.

Indexed as

Bone WiresDecompression, SurgicalDiskectomyEndoscopyIntervertebral Disc DisplacementLumbar VertebraeAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID40595734
PMCPMC12214834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.