ArticleNature communications2025
Hedgehog topological defects in 3D amorphous solids.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- On the geometry of topological defects in glasses.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The underlying structural disorder renders the concept of topological defects in amorphous solids difficult to apply and hinders a first-principle identification of the microscopic carriers of plasticity and of regions prone to structural rearrangements ("soft spots"). Recently, it has been proposed that well-defined topological defects can still be identified in glasses. However, all existing proposals apply only to two spatial dimensions and are correlated with plasticity. We propose that hedgehog topological defects can be used to characterize plasticity in 3D glasses and to geometrically identify soft spots. We corroborate this idea via simulations of a Kremer-Grest 3D polymer glass, analyzing both the normal mode eigenvector field and the displacement field around large plastic events. Unlike the 2D case, the sign of the topological charge in 3D within the eigenvector field is ambiguous, and the defect geometry plays a crucial role. We find that topological hedgehog defects relevant for plasticity exhibit hyperbolic geometry, resembling 2D anti-vortices having negative winding number. Our results confirm the feasibility of a topological characterization of plasticity in 3D glasses, revealing an intricate interplay between topology and geometry that is absent in 2D disordered systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.