Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40595675›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Hybrid machine learning and physics-based model for estimating lettuce (Lactuca sativa) growth and resource consumption in aeroponic systems.

Benedetta Fasciolo, Nicolò Grasso, Giulia Bruno, Paolo Chiabert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Benedetta FascioloPolitecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, Torino, 10129, Italy. benedetta.fasciolo@polito.it.
Nicolò GrassoPolitecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, Torino, 10129, Italy.
Giulia BrunoPolitecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, Torino, 10129, Italy.
Paolo ChiabertPolitecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, Torino, 10129, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the global population is expected to reach 10.3 billion by the mid-2080s, optimizing agricultural production and resource management is crucial. Climate change and environmental degradation further complicate these challenges, impacting crop productivity and food security. Traditional farming methods struggle with efficiently managing nutrients and water while ensuring high-quality products, leading to resource wastage and food safety concerns. This study aims to develop a hybrid model combining machine learning and physics-based techniques to predict fresh weight, leaf area, nitrate levels, and water consumption in lettuce grown in aeroponic systems, thereby enhancing resource management and product quality. We integrated a physics-based model with machine learning algorithms to create a dynamic hybrid framework. The model was validated with real-time data from aeroponic systems, showing good predictive performance, particularly for fresh weight and total leaf area. In contrast, predictions of nitrate content and water consumption were less accurate, due in part to smaller training datasets and limitations of the physics-based component under soilless conditions. Despite these challenges, the hybrid model offers a promising solution for optimizing controlled environment agriculture, addressing critical challenges in modern agriculture by improving efficiency and sustainability.

Indexed as

LactucaMachine LearningAgricultureAlgorithmsNitratesPlant LeavesWaterNitratesWaterAeroponicHybrid modelIoTMachine learningPhysics-based modelPredictive model

Identifiers

PMID40595675
PMCPMC12215297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.