ArticleNature communications2025
Mitigating data bias and ensuring reliable evaluation of AI models with shortcut hull learning.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robust and Interpretable Metagenomic Modeling Through Structure-Aware Multi-View Learning and Attribution-Guided Biological Insight.Research square · 2026Article
- Mitigating data bias and ensuring reliable evaluation of AI models with shortcut hull learning.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shortcut learning poses a significant challenge to both the interpretability and robustness of artificial intelligence, arising from dataset biases that lead models to exploit unintended correlations, or shortcuts, which undermine performance evaluations. Addressing these inherent biases is particularly difficult due to the complex, high-dimensional nature of data. Here, we introduce shortcut hull learning, a diagnostic paradigm that unifies shortcut representations in probability space and utilizes diverse models with different inductive biases to efficiently learn and identify shortcuts. This paradigm establishes a comprehensive, shortcut-free evaluation framework, validated by developing a shortcut-free topological dataset to assess deep neural networks' global capabilities, enabling a shift from Minsky and Papert's representational analysis to an empirical investigation of learning capacity. Unexpectedly, our experimental results suggest that under this framework, convolutional models-typically considered weak in global capabilities-outperform transformer-based models, challenging prevailing beliefs. By enabling robust and bias-free evaluation, our framework uncovers the true model capabilities beyond architectural preferences, offering a foundation for advancing AI interpretability and reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.