Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40595602›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Mitigating data bias and ensuring reliable evaluation of AI models with shortcut hull learning.

Wenhao Zhou, Faqiang Liu, Hao Zheng, Rong Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wenhao ZhouCenter for Brain-Inspired Computing Research (CBICR), Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0411-414X
Faqiang LiuCenter for Brain-Inspired Computing Research (CBICR), Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2236-0539
Hao ZhengCenter for Brain-Inspired Computing Research (CBICR), Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Rong ZhaoCenter for Brain-Inspired Computing Research (CBICR), Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. r_zhao@tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2320-0326

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shortcut learning poses a significant challenge to both the interpretability and robustness of artificial intelligence, arising from dataset biases that lead models to exploit unintended correlations, or shortcuts, which undermine performance evaluations. Addressing these inherent biases is particularly difficult due to the complex, high-dimensional nature of data. Here, we introduce shortcut hull learning, a diagnostic paradigm that unifies shortcut representations in probability space and utilizes diverse models with different inductive biases to efficiently learn and identify shortcuts. This paradigm establishes a comprehensive, shortcut-free evaluation framework, validated by developing a shortcut-free topological dataset to assess deep neural networks' global capabilities, enabling a shift from Minsky and Papert's representational analysis to an empirical investigation of learning capacity. Unexpectedly, our experimental results suggest that under this framework, convolutional models-typically considered weak in global capabilities-outperform transformer-based models, challenging prevailing beliefs. By enabling robust and bias-free evaluation, our framework uncovers the true model capabilities beyond architectural preferences, offering a foundation for advancing AI interpretability and reliability.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAlgorithmsBiasDeep LearningHumansNeural Networks, ComputerReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID40595602
PMCPMC12219125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.