Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40595546›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Thalamocortical feedback selectively controls pyramidal neuron excitability.

Federico Brandalise, Ronan Chéreau, I-Wen Chen, David van Oorschot, Claudia Morin Raig, Tanika Bawa, Nandkishor Mule, Stéphane Pagès, Foivos Markopoulos, Anthony Holtmaat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Presynaptic control of top-down signaling in neocortical layer 1.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Federico Brandalise *Department of Basic Neurosciences and the Geneva University Neurocenter, Centre Médical Universitaire (CMU), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Ronan Chéreau *Department of Basic Neurosciences and the Geneva University Neurocenter, Centre Médical Universitaire (CMU), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2359-3086
I-Wen ChenDepartment of Basic Neurosciences and the Geneva University Neurocenter, Centre Médical Universitaire (CMU), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0598-7230
David van OorschotDepartment of Basic Neurosciences and the Geneva University Neurocenter, Centre Médical Universitaire (CMU), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-8557-4200
Claudia Morin RaigDepartment of Basic Neurosciences and the Geneva University Neurocenter, Centre Médical Universitaire (CMU), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1087-1090
Tanika BawaDepartment of Basic Neurosciences and the Geneva University Neurocenter, Centre Médical Universitaire (CMU), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1368-0346
Nandkishor MuleDepartment of Basic Neurosciences and the Geneva University Neurocenter, Centre Médical Universitaire (CMU), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8429-2490
Stéphane PagèsDepartment of Basic Neurosciences and the Geneva University Neurocenter, Centre Médical Universitaire (CMU), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Foivos MarkopoulosDepartment of Basic Neurosciences and the Geneva University Neurocenter, Centre Médical Universitaire (CMU), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Anthony HoltmaatDepartment of Basic Neurosciences and the Geneva University Neurocenter, Centre Médical Universitaire (CMU), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. anthony.holtmaat@unige.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7577-0769

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) 310030_204562
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The apical dendrites of layer (L) 2/3 pyramidal neurons in the mouse somatosensory cortex integrate synaptic input from long-range projections. Among those, inputs from the higher-order thalamic posteromedial nucleus may facilitate sensory-evoked cortical activity, but it remains elusive how this role emerges. Here we show using ex vivo dendritic recordings that these projections provide dense synaptic input to broad tufted neurons residing predominantly in L2 and cooperate with other inputs to produce NMDA spikes. They have the unique capacity to block two-pore domain potassium leak channels via group 1 metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluRI) signaling, which increases excitability. Slender tufted L2/3 neurons and other long-range projections fail to invoke these mechanisms. In vivo imaging of calcium signals confirms the presence of mGluRI-dependent modulation of feedback-mediated spiking in L2. Our results imply that higher-order thalamocortical projections regulate neuronal excitability in a cell type and input-selective manner through fast NMDAR and mGluRI-dependent mechanisms.

Indexed as

Feedback, PhysiologicalPyramidal CellsSomatosensory CortexThalamusAction PotentialsAnimalsDendritesFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLReceptors, Metabotropic GlutamateReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartatemetabotropic glutamate receptor type 1Receptors, Metabotropic GlutamateReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID40595546
PMCPMC12215560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.