Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40595515›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

An intracranial dissection of human escape circuits.

Haoming Zhang, Jiayu Cheng, Keyu Hu, Fengpeng Wang, Song Qi, Quanying Liu, Yi Yao, Dean Mobbs, Haiyan Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Haoming ZhangCentre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences and Department of Psychology, University of Macau, Macau, China.
Jiayu ChengCentre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences and Department of Psychology, University of Macau, Macau, China.
Keyu HuCentre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences and Department of Psychology, University of Macau, Macau, China.
Fengpeng WangDepartment of Functional Neurosurgery, Xiamen Humanity Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Song QiSection on Development and Affective Neuroscience, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Quanying LiuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2501-7656
Yi YaoDepartment of Functional Neurosurgery, Xiamen Humanity Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China. tygnsjwk@163.com.
Dean MobbsDepartment of Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1175-3772
Haiyan WuCentre for Cognitive and Brain Sciences and Department of Psychology, University of Macau, Macau, China. haiyanwu@um.edu.mo.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8869-6636

Funding

Fundo para o Desenvolvimento das Ciências e da Tecnologia (Science and Technology Development Fund) 0127/2020/A3Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Guangdong Natural Science Foundation) 2021A1515012509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predators attack across diverse spatiotemporal scales, prompting prey to respond through simple motor reactions (e.g., fleeing) or more complex cognitive processes (e.g., strategic planning). Recent studies suggest that escape relies on two distinct circuits: the reactive and cognitive fear circuits. However, their specific roles in different stages of escaping remain unclear. In this study, we recorded SEEG from epilepsy patients while they performed a modified flight initiation distance task. We identified cognitive fear regions, including the vmPFC and hippocampus, that encoded threat levels during the information processing stage. In the actual escaping stage, especially under rapid attack, the reactive fear circuit, including the midcingulate cortex and amygdala, was prominently activated. Notably, under rapid attack, we observed significant theta-band information flow from the amygdala to the vmPFC, suggesting dynamic communication between the reactive and cognitive fear circuits. These findings illuminate the distinct and complementary roles of the reactive and cognitive fear circuits in facilitating successful human escape.

Indexed as

EpilepsyEscape ReactionAdolescentAdultCognitionElectroencephalographyFearFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedSkinYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40595515
PMCPMC12219568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.