ArticleNature communications2025
Fully non-fused electron acceptor solar cells with 18% efficiency via a synergistic peripheral substituent strategy.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding non-fullerene acceptors for organic solar cells: a theoretical structure-property-performance perspective.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Three-Step Synthesis Toward Fluorene-Based Non-Fused-Ring Acceptors for Organic Solar Cells.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Terminal acceptor engineering for reduced energy dissipation and enhanced charge transport in benzodithiophene-core based donor molecules: a computational route to efficient organic solar cells.Nanoscale advances · 2026Article
- Spin-manipulation via novel MoPSNature communications · 2026Article
- Balancing driving force, charge transport, and non-radiative recombination in organic solar cells with non-fused ring acceptors.EES solar · 2026Article
- Facile Access to IDT-Based Acceptor via Direct C-H Arylation and Its Exploration in Binary and Ternary Organic Solar Cells.Chemistry, an Asian journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Toward commercialization of organic solar cells (OSCs), photoactive materials that enable high efficiency yet possess low cost should be developed. Fully non-fused ring electron acceptors (FNEAs) that extend the conjugated skeleton with carbon-carbon (C-C) single bonds solely have lower synthetic costs than their fused-ring counterparts. However, the power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of FNEAs are lagging due to low acceptor crystallinity and difficulty in the formation of fibrillary bi-continuous interpenetrating network morphology. Herein, we report four FNEAs (NEH-4F, EEH-4F, NBO-4F, and EBO-4F) through rational design of peripheral substituents. Specifically, the encapsulated central core guarantees the planarity of the conjugated skeleton and improves acceptor crystallinity, while the lengthened outer side chains modulate the molecular stacking and regulate the thermodynamic compatibility between the FNEAs and the polymer donor PTTz. Therefore, nanoscale phase separation morphology with bi-continuous interpenetrating fibril network structures was found in the blend of PTTz:EBO-4F, which promotes exciton diffusion and charge transport in solar cells. A record-breaking PCE of 18.04% is thus obtained, which greatly reduces the efficiency gap between FNEAs and fused-ring electron acceptors. These results demonstrate the promising prospect of fabricating high-efficiency OSCs from low-cost FNEAs through rational molecular design.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.