ArticleCommunications medicine2025
A self-supervised framework for laboratory data imputation in electronic health records.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaboratory data in electronic health records (EHRs) is an effective source of information to characterize patient populations, inform accurate diagnostics and treatment decisions, and fuel research studies. However, despite their value, laboratory values are underutilized due to high levels of missingness. Existing imputation methods fall short, as they do not fully leverage patient clinical histories and are commonly not scalable to the large number of tests available in real-world data (RWD).
methodsTo address these shortcomings, we present Laboratory Imputation Framework for EHRs (LIFE), a self-supervised learning framework based on multi-head attention that is trained to impute any laboratory test value at any point in time in the patient's journey using their complete EHRs. This architecture (1) eliminates the need to train a different model for each laboratory test by jointly modeling all laboratory data of interest; and (2) better clinically contextualizes the predictions by leveraging additional EHR variables, such as diagnosis, medications, and discrete laboratory results.
resultsWe validate our framework using a large-scale, real-world dataset encompassing over 1 million oncology patients. Our results demonstrate that LIFE obtains superior or equivalent results compared to state-of-the-art baseline methods in 23 out of 25 evaluated laboratory tests and better enhances a downstream adverse event detection task in 7 out of 9 cases.
conclusionsLIFE shows promise in accurately estimating missing laboratory values and enhancing the utilization of large-scale RWD in healthcare. This advancement could lead to better clinical models, more informed decision-making and improved patient outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.