ArticleCommunications medicine2025
Tuning vision foundation models for rectal cancer segmentation from CT scans.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rectal cancer segmentation via HHF-SAM: a hierarchical hypercolumn-guided fusion segment anything model.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRectal cancer segmentation in CT is crucial for timely diagnosis. Despite promising methods, challenges remain due to the rectum's complex anatomy and the lack of a comprehensive annotated dataset.
methodsA total of 33,024 slice pairs from 398 rectal cancer patients in a new source center are enrolled into our dataset, named CARE Dataset, with pixel-level annotations for both normal and cancerous rectum tissue. We split it into 317 cases for training and 81 for testing. Additionally, we introduce a segmentation model, U-SAM, which, to the best of our knowledge, is a novel approach designed to handle the complex anatomy of the rectum by incorporating prompt information. Segmentation performance for both normal and cancerous rectum was evaluated using Intersection-over-Union (IoU), Dice Coefficient (Dice), and Normalized Surface Distance (NSD). With the assistance of 46 clinical practitioners, an observer study is conducted to benchmark the U-SAM with human performance and evaluate its clinical applicability. The original new source 398 CT scans and our code are openly available for research.
resultsOur method achieves Dice of 71.23% for normal rectum and 76.38% for rectal tumor, with IoU of 55.32% and 61.78%, and NSD values of 83.63% and 58.59%, respectively, surpassing state-of-the-art methods. The observer study validates that U-SAM can produce diagnostic results comparable to those of highly experienced doctors in just 3 seconds of inference time (with about 5 minutes for prompt acquisition) in clinical settings.
conclusionsThe proposed U-SAM offers an efficient and reliable method for segmenting rectal cancer and normal tissue, significantly reducing time in clinical settings and effectively assisting radiologists. We believe this initial exploration in CT-based rectal cancer segmentation will be instrumental for future diagnosis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.