Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40595386›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2025

Tuning vision foundation models for rectal cancer segmentation from CT scans.

Hantao Zhang, Weidong Guo, Shouhong Wan, Bingbing Zou, Wanqin Wang, Chenyang Qiu, Kaige Liu, Peiquan Jin, Jiancheng Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hantao ZhangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-9849-3507
Weidong GuoSchool of Computer Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Shouhong WanSchool of Computer Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China. wansh@ustc.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-4368-8223
Bingbing ZouInstitute of Artificial Intelligence, Hefei Comprehensive National Science Center, Hefei, China.
Wanqin WangInstitute of Artificial Intelligence, Hefei Comprehensive National Science Center, Hefei, China.
Chenyang QiuInstitute of Artificial Intelligence, Hefei Comprehensive National Science Center, Hefei, China.
Kaige LiuInstitute of Artificial Intelligence, Hefei Comprehensive National Science Center, Hefei, China.
Peiquan JinSchool of Computer Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Jiancheng YangComputer Vision Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4455-7145

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRectal cancer segmentation in CT is crucial for timely diagnosis. Despite promising methods, challenges remain due to the rectum's complex anatomy and the lack of a comprehensive annotated dataset.

methodsA total of 33,024 slice pairs from 398 rectal cancer patients in a new source center are enrolled into our dataset, named CARE Dataset, with pixel-level annotations for both normal and cancerous rectum tissue. We split it into 317 cases for training and 81 for testing. Additionally, we introduce a segmentation model, U-SAM, which, to the best of our knowledge, is a novel approach designed to handle the complex anatomy of the rectum by incorporating prompt information. Segmentation performance for both normal and cancerous rectum was evaluated using Intersection-over-Union (IoU), Dice Coefficient (Dice), and Normalized Surface Distance (NSD). With the assistance of 46 clinical practitioners, an observer study is conducted to benchmark the U-SAM with human performance and evaluate its clinical applicability. The original new source 398 CT scans and our code are openly available for research.

resultsOur method achieves Dice of 71.23% for normal rectum and 76.38% for rectal tumor, with IoU of 55.32% and 61.78%, and NSD values of 83.63% and 58.59%, respectively, surpassing state-of-the-art methods. The observer study validates that U-SAM can produce diagnostic results comparable to those of highly experienced doctors in just 3 seconds of inference time (with about 5 minutes for prompt acquisition) in clinical settings.

conclusionsThe proposed U-SAM offers an efficient and reliable method for segmenting rectal cancer and normal tissue, significantly reducing time in clinical settings and effectively assisting radiologists. We believe this initial exploration in CT-based rectal cancer segmentation will be instrumental for future diagnosis.

Identifiers

PMID40595386
PMCPMC12219254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.