ArticleScientific reports2025
Exploring critical factors for enhancing the effectiveness of scientific and technological innovation and policy implications based on data from China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the context of growing global competition in science and technology, improving the effectiveness of scientific and technological (S&T) innovation is critical for strengthening China's overall S&T competitiveness. To identify the critical factors that influence the enhancement of S&T innovation effectiveness, this study employs the grounded theory and qualitative analysis techniques. Based on survey data from domestic researchers (286 responses), a critical factor model was developed consisting of five primary dimensions: "researchers' professional skills-research team collaboration-research management and organizational support-construction of a research innovation environment-research policy and incentive mechanisms". Furthermore, a measurement scale for these critical factors (306 responses) was designed and distributed. The findings of the study are as follows: (1) Based on the initial categories obtained through open coding, researchers prioritize, researchers prioritize research output evaluation and performance incentives, investment and allocation of research resources, and the innovation environment and academic atmosphere, emphasizing the need for policies that integrate both 'hard' and 'soft' elements to foster innovation. (2) The enhancement of S&T innovation effectiveness is influenced by multiple factors, with the most critical being researchers' professional skills, followed by research policy and incentive mechanisms, research team collaboration, the research innovation environment, and organizational support. The conclusions of this study expect to provide valuable insights for enhancing research innovation motivation, refining research management policies, and identifying key areas for research support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.