ArticleScientific reports2025
Global-local graph attention with cyclic pseudo-labels for bitcoin anti-money laundering detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Illicit Bitcoin transaction detection via feature-gated temporal graph learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Detecting illicit transactions in bitcoin: a wavelet-temporal graph transformer approach for anti-money laundering.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper addresses the problem of detecting money laundering in the Bitcoin network. Money laundering is the process of handling the proceeds of crime to conceal their illegal source, these illicit transactions have complex features, similar to those of legal transactions. It is well known that transactions can be represented as topological graph structure data, and many GCN-based methods have been developed for Anti-Money Laundering (AML) tasks. However, existing methods have not performed as well in dynamically assigning weights to neighboring nodes and extracting information from global nodes in the Bitcoin network. Therefore, we identify three major challenges: Firstly, GCNs can be misled by concealed illegal transactions due to uniform node representation weights. Secondly, current node-level GCNs cannot handle varied methods of concealing illegal transactions because they fail to extract global information. Thirdly, the costliness of data labelling necessitates the effective use of limited but rich domain-specific labelled data. To address these challenges, we propose the Transformer-enhanced Graph Attention Network (TFGAT) with a Global-Local Attention Mechanism (GLATM) that uses Transformers to extract global information and selectively focus on local information from connected nodes. Due to the limited availability of labelled data from expensive data labelling processes, we introduce a Deep Cyclic Pseudo-Label Updating Mechanism (DCPLU) to enhance data distribution and model robustness, which does not rely on manifold structure or Euclidean distance assumptions. DCPLU can enhance model performance while preserving the model's existing parameters, enabling it to maintain its current faster response time in the application scenario. Experimental results show that our methods outperform existing models across various metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.