Observational studyScientific reports2025
Comparative efficacy of certoparin, enoxaparin, and combined thromboprophylaxis on thromboembolic events after glioblastoma resection: a prospective observational study.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anticoagulation Following Surgery for Glioblastoma: Case Report and Review of the Literature.Journal of neurological surgery reports · 2026Article
- Antibody therapies in glioblastoma: Overcoming micro-environmental barriers.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Review
- Venous thromboembolism and secondary outcomes of bleeding and mortality in patients with gliomas: a multicenter cohort study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thromboembolic events (TE) are serious complications following glioblastoma (GBM) resection. This retrospective study analyzed 695 GBM patients (2017-2022, University Hospital Dresden) to assess the impact of different anticoagulant regimens-certoparin, enoxaparin, and enoxaparin with intermittent pneumatic stockings (IPS)-along with patient comorbidities, on TE incidence. Overall, 28 patients (4%) developed TE. The highest combined incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) occurred in the enoxaparin group (8.6%), followed by certoparin (6.9%) and enoxaparin + IPS (2.6%) (p = .003). Increased PE risk was associated with longer surgery duration (median 249 vs. 190 min; p = .002), greater intraoperative blood loss (300 vs. 150 mL; p = .002), and older age (> 65 years, p = .043). Comorbidities such as diabetes (p = .005) and coronary heart disease (p = .037) were also linked to elevated TE risk. Multivariate analysis identified enoxaparin alone as an independent risk factor (HR 0.312; CI 0.116-0.842; p = .022). Patients with PE or DVT had surgeries that were on average 45 min longer and involved higher blood loss. GBM patients treated with enoxaparin alone have a significantly higher risk for TE compared to treatment with certoparin or the combination of enoxaparin with IPS. Additionally, the duration of surgery, patient age and comorbidities significantly influence the risk of postoperative TE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.