ArticleScientific reports2025
Modelling the environmental impact of sesame production under different fertilizer and water use regimes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanisms and Research Progress of Phosphate-Solubilizing Microorganisms in Promoting Sustainable Crop Production.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Nanotechnology strategies for enhancing productivity, sulphur use efficiency and soil fertility in groundnut-mustard cropping systems.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Urea and potassium nitrate synergy in sesame cultivation: boosting growth, yield, and antioxidant resilience through tailored nitrogen fertilization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sesame is a vital oilseed crop that is valued for its high-quality oil and nutritious seeds. It is imperative to enhance sesame yields through fertilization, yet it is equally crucial to understand the environmental impacts of these practices if sustainable production is to be achieved. The present study evaluated the environmental effects of various fertilization treatments (bacteria, mycorrhizal fungi, chemical fertilisers, and their combinations) under normal and drought stress conditions using a life cycle assessment (LCA) following ISO 14,040 and ISO 14,044 standards. The research was conducted in 2022 at two farms in Rodan city, Hormozgan province, Iran. The IMPACT 2002 + method was employed to assess the impacts across 16 scenarios for producing one ton of sesame seed. The findings of the study indicated that the utilisation of chemical fertilisers (NPK) in conjunction with standard irrigation practices resulted in the most significant environmental impacts, particularly with regard to human health. In contrast, the control treatment subjected to drought stress exhibited the least detrimental outcomes. The implementation of low-input and organic management practices, including the reduction of nitrogen fertilisers and the incorporation of biofertilisers or nitrogen-fixing crops, has been demonstrated to significantly mitigate environmental impacts. However, it should be noted that these practices have also been shown to result in a reduction in crop yields. These findings underscore the potential of biofertilizers and drought stress management to promote sustainable sesame production, offering valuable insights for policymakers and farmers seeking to balance productivity with environmental stewardship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.