Synergizing advanced algorithm of explainable artificial intelligence with hybrid model for enhanced brain tumor detection in healthcare.

Brain tumor causes life-threatening consequences due to which its timely detection and accurate classification are critical for determining appropriate treatment plans while focusing on the improved patient outcomes. However, conventional approaches of brain tumor diagnosis, such as Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT) scans, are often labor-intensive, prone to human error, and completely reliable on expertise of radiologists.Thus, the integration of advanced techniques such as Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) has brought revolution in the healthcare sector due to their supporting features or properties having ability to analyze medical images in recent years, demonstrating great potential for achieving accurate and improved outcomes but also resulted in a few drawbacks due to their black-box nature. As understanding reasoning behind their predictions is still a great challenge for the healthcare professionals and raised a great concern about their trustworthiness, interpretability and transparency in clinical settings. Thus, an advanced algorithm of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has been synergized with hybrid model comprising of DenseNet201 network for extracting the most important features based on the input Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data following supervised algorithm, support vector machine (SVM) to distinguish distinct types of brain scans. To overcome this, an explainable hybrid framework has been proposed that integrates DenseNet201 for deep feature extraction with a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier for robust binary classification. A region-adaptive preprocessing pipeline is used to enhance tumor visibility and feature clarity. To address the need for interpretability, multiple XAI techniques-Grad-CAM, Integrated Gradients (IG), and Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP) have been incorporated. Our comparative evaluation shows that LRP achieves the highest performance across all explainability metrics, with 98.64% accuracy, 0.74 F1-score, and 0.78 IoU. The proposed model provides transparent and highly accurate diagnostic predictions, offering a reliable clinical decision support tool. It achieves 0.9801 accuracy, 0.9223 sensitivity, 0.9909 specificity, 0.9154 precision, and 0.9360 F1-score, demonstrating strong potential for real-world brain tumor diagnosis and personalized treatment strategies.