ArticleScientific reports2025
Impact of the "L" score from the RENAL nephrometry score on RAPN surgical outcomes in medial versus lateral renal tumors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The significance of "L" score in the radius (R), exophytic/endophytic (E), nearness (N), anterior/posterior (A), location (L); RENAL nephrometry scoring system remains unestablished compared to other subscores. This study assessed the influence of the "L" score on surgical and functional outcomes of RAPN, dividing renal tumors into medial and lateral relative to the kidney's central line, to explore its impact on "L" score utility. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 668 RAPN patients, with 405 having medial and 263 lateral renal tumors. Patients who underwent RAPN were retrospectively analyzed, including 405 with medial renal tumors and 263 with lateral renal tumors. In medial tumors, the "L" score independently predicted non-achievement of trifecta (P = 0.011) and pentafecta (P = 0.032). In lateral tumors, the "L" score did not predict non-achievement of these outcomes. In conclusion, significance of the "L" score on surgical outcomes differs between medial and lateral tumors and it is strongly associated with outcomes in medial tumors, whereas its predictive value in lateral tumors is less marked. The RENAL nephrometry score lacks differentiation between medial and lateral tumors; therefore, surgeons should interpret "L" scores with caution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.