ArticleScientific reports2025
Calibration and establishment for the discrete element simulation parameters of pepper stem during harvest period.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the problem of poorly defined mechanical parameters in discrete element simulations of mechanized pepper harvesting, a discrete element model was developed to accurately represent the biomechanical characteristics of pepper stems. This research presents a parameter calibration and optimization approach using both Hertz-Mindlin and Hertz-Mindlin with bonding methods. The basic properties of the pepper stems were determined by mechanical property testing, while the stacking angle was assessed using the cylinder lift technique. The stacking angle and maximum bending damage force were used as evaluation indexes. Significant parameters influencing the model were identified using the Plackett-Burman test, followed by a steepest ascent test to define the central test group. The Central-Composite and Box-Behnken tests were then used to formulate quadratic regression equations and optimal parameter combinations for the significant factors were derived using an optimization solver to validate the accuracy of the model. The results showed that the relative errors between simulated and actual values for the two models under optimal conditions were 0.86% and 1.02%, respectively. The discrete element model of pepper stems closely approximates real-world conditions and reflects the mechanical behavior of pepper stems as they bend and break upon impact during harvesting. This research provides a basic framework for mechanistic analysis of the pepper harvesting process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.