ArticleScientific reports2025
Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness profile in an Iranian adult population.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quadrant-specific anatomical architecture of the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer: a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography study.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To determine the distribution of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL) and its associated factors in a normal adult population using Spectralis spectral-domain (SD) optical coherence tomography (OCT). This research was conducted utilizing data from the third phase of the Shahroud Eye Cohort Study. Participants were selected from Shahroud City through a multi-stage cluster sampling technique. Uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity, as well as refraction, were assessed for all participants. Subsequently, each individual underwent slit-lamp examinations conducted by an ophthalmologist. Following pupillary dilation with tropicamide 1% drops, fundoscopic examinations were carried out, and OCT imaging was performed using a Heidelberg Spectralis OCT device. A total of 3,700 eyes from 2,102 participants were included in this report. The average global RNFL thickness recorded in this study was 100.3 µm (95% CI: 99.9-100.7). When analyzed by sex, the average global RNFL thickness was 99.5 µm (95% CI: 98.9-100.1) for men and 100.9 µm (95% CI: 100.3-101.5) for women. Utilizing a multiple generalized estimating equations (GEE) model, the global RNFL thickness demonstrated a direct association with body mass index (β = 0.11; p = 0.013), corneal radius of curvature (β = 5.27; p < 0.001), and macular volume (β = 7.64; p < 0.001) while showing an inverse relationship with axial length (β=-2.29; p < 0.001), central macular thickness (β=-21.39; p = 0.002), and the presence of diabetes (β=-1.09; p = 0.009). The RNFL thickness profile within a normative cohort aged 50 to 74 years was demonstrated using Spectralis SD-OCT imaging. Beyond biometric indices, it is crucial to consider certain systemic factors that may influence RNFL thickness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.