ArticleScientific reports2025
Advanced cloud intrusion detection framework using graph based features transformers and contrastive learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a modular and scalable intrusion detection framework that combines graph-based feature extraction, Transformer-based autoencoding, and contrastive learning to improve detection accuracy in cloud environments. Network flows are modeled as graphs to capture relational patterns among IP addresses and services, and a Graph Neural Network (GNN) is used to extract structured embeddings. These embeddings are refined through a Transformer-based autoencoder to preserve contextual information, while contrastive learning enforces clear class separation during classification. The system is evaluated on NSL-KDD and CIC-IDS2018 datasets under both binary and multi-class scenarios. Experimental results show an average accuracy of 99.97%, with high precision and recall across all attack types, including minority classes such as U2R and R2L. The model achieves low false-positive rates and demonstrates real-time inference performance with modest resource requirements. Key contributions include an interpretable pipeline using SHAP for feature attribution, a strategy for mitigating class imbalance, and validation across datasets with detailed security and generalizability analyses. These results support the practical applicability of the proposed approach in high-throughput, cloud-based network environments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.