ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep learning-based sex estimation of 3D hyoid bone models in a Croatian population using adapted PointNet++ network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated femoral measurement from postmortem computed tomographic images using artificial intelligence for forensic stature estimation in a Japanese population.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Classifying Sex from MSCT-Derived 3D Mandibular Models Using an Adapted PointNet++ Deep Learning Approach in a Croatian Population.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates a deep learning approach for sex estimation using 3D hyoid bone models derived from computed tomography (CT) scans of a Croatian population. We analyzed 202 hyoid samples (101 male, 101 female), converting CT-derived meshes into 2048-point clouds for processing with an adapted PointNet++ network. The model, optimized for small datasets with 1D convolutional layers and global size features, was first applied in an unsupervised framework. Unsupervised clustering achieved 87.10% accuracy, identifying natural sex-based morphological patterns. Subsequently, supervised classification with a support vector machine yielded an accuracy of 88.71% (Matthews Correlation Coefficient, MCC = 0.7746) on a test set (n = 62). Interpretability analysis highlighted key regions influencing classification, with males exhibiting larger, U-shaped hyoids and females showing smaller, more open structures. Despite the modest sample size, the method effectively captured sex differences, providing a data-efficient and interpretable tool. This flexible approach, combining computational efficiency with practical insights, demonstrates potential for aiding sex estimation in cases with limited skeletal remains and may support broader applications in forensic anthropology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.