ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting diabetic peripheral neuropathy through advanced plantar pressure analysis: a machine learning approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for detection, prediction, and severity classification of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Advances in the application of artificial intelligence-driven multi-modal imaging technologies in the comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026Review
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model for Type 2 Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: Role of Bilateral Brachial-Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity and Anthropometric Indicators.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Associations between blood glucose and dynamic plantar pressure distribution in pre-DM patients: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Deep exploration and precise identification of key risk factors for diabetic peripheral neuropathy using the random forest algorithm.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic foot Ulceration (DFU) is a severe complication of diabetic foot syndrome, often leading to amputation. In patients with neuropathy, ulcer formation is facilitated by elevated plantar tissue stress under insensate feet. This study presents a plantar pressure distribution analysis method to predict diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The Win-Track platform was used to gather clinical and plantar pressure data from 86 diabetic patients with different degrees of neuropathy. An automated image processing algorithm segmented plantar pressure images into forefoot and hindfoot regions for precise pressure distribution measurement. Comparative analysis of static and dynamic assessment showed that static analysis consistently outperformed dynamic methods. Gradient Boosting achieved the highest accuracy (88% dynamic, 100% static), with Random Forest and Decision Tree also performing well. Explainable AI techniques (SHAP, Eli5, Anchor Explanations) provided insights into feature importance, enhancing model interpretability. Additionally, a foot classification system based on the forefoot-hindfoot pressure ratio categorized feet as flat, regular, or arched. These findings support the development of improved diagnostic tools for early neuropathy detection, aiding risk stratification and prevention strategies. Enhanced screening can help reduce DFU incidence, lower amputation rates, and ultimately decrease diabetes-related mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.