Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40595120›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparative analysis of RAD-seq methods for SNP discovery and genetic diversity assessment in oil seed crop safflower.

Pooja Pathania, Gaddam Prasanna Kumar, Nishu Gupta, R Parimalan, J Radhamani, Rajesh Kumar, Sunil Shriram Gomashe, Palchamy Kadirvel, S Rajkumar

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pooja PathaniaICAR- National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Gaddam Prasanna KumarICAR- National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Nishu GuptaICAR- National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, 110012, India.
R ParimalanICAR- National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, 110012, India.
J RadhamaniICAR- National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Rajesh KumarICAR- National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Sunil Shriram GomasheICAR- National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, RS-Akola, Akola, India.
Palchamy KadirvelICAR-Indian Institute of Oilseeds Research, Rajendranagar, 500030, Hyderabad, India.
S RajkumarICAR- National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, Pusa Campus, New Delhi, 110012, India. s.rajkumar@icar.org.in.

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India BT/Ag/Network/Safflower/2019-20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) is an important oilseed crop with diverse uses and the potential for genetic improvement. This study aimed to optimize genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) for safflower via in silico and in vitro methods with two restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq) approaches, i.e., single restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (sdRAD-seq) and double-digest RAD sequencing (ddRAD-seq) and three restriction enzyme combinations (ApeKI, NlaIII_Msel, and EcoRI_Msel). Forty-two safflower accessions were selected for this study. In silico testing revealed that NlaIII_Msel generated the largest number of DNA fragments, followed by ApeKI and EcoRI_Msel. The in vitro results showed that ddRAD-seq outperformed sdRAD-seq in terms of raw read count, alignment rate, depth and breadth of coverage, and SNP detection. An alignment-free analysis using k-mer counting and sketching based on genetic distance further confirmed the superiority of ddRAD-seq. Gene-level k-mer validation identified more core genes in the ddRAD-seq data. Variant calling resulted in 6,721, 173,212, and 221,805 single nucleotide polymorphic sites (SNPs) for ApeKI, NlaIII_Msel, and EcoRI_Msel, respectively. SNP annotation and distribution analysis revealed that EcoRI_Msel captured more SNPs with fewer missing observations. Principal component analysis via ddRAD-seq data explained 30.29% and 33.98% of the total genetic variation in NlaIII_Msel and EcoRI_Msel, respectively. This study demonstrated that ddRAD-seq with the EcoRI_Msel enzyme combination is the most suitable GBS approach for genome sampling and SNP genotyping in safflower.

Indexed as

Carthamus tinctoriusGenetic VariationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSeedsSequence Analysis, DNAGenome, PlantGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingCarthamus tinctoriusGenetic diversityGenome samplingRAD-seqRestriction enzymesSNP discovery

Identifiers

PMID40595120
PMCPMC12217066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.