ArticleScientific reports2025
Direct recording of electrically evoked cortical potentials from cochlear implants demonstrates feasibility and clinical relevance in pediatric users.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Auditory Stimulation, Not Device Type: Comparable Cortical Maturation in Children Using Cochlear Implants or Hearing Aids.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Speech-Evoked Cortical Auditory Potentials as Biomarkers of Auditory Maturation in Children with Cochlear Implants.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Association between cortical auditory evoked potentials recorded directly through cochlear implants and post-implantation auditory and speech outcomes.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracochlear electrodes in cochlear implants (CIs) offer a novel method for recording auditory brain activity without external EEG equipment, addressing challenges in pediatric CI users. This study tested the feasibility of recording electrically evoked cortical auditory potentials (eCAEPs) directly via the CI system. Twenty children and three adults with bilateral Advanced Bionics CIs participated. A brief electrical stimulus was delivered to one CI, while the contralateral CI recorded responses using a basal electrode referenced to the case. Each session included stimulus and non-stimulus sweeps, with averaging over 600 ms revealing clear eCAEP patterns. All participants exhibited obligatory P1, N1, and P2 peaks within a test duration of under five minutes. The method showed good test-retest repeatability and expected latency shifts occurred with stimulus level adjustments. Compared to scalp recorded EEG, intracochlear recordings produced significantly larger amplitudes with similar latencies. Early implanted children displayed distinct eCAEP patterns, and better performing CI users had earlier P1 responses. This recording approach provides a robust, non-invasive tool for monitoring CI users, particularly young children, offering potential advancements in post-implantation assessment and intervention by eliminating external equipment while ensuring reliable recordings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.