Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40595114›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Utilizing Saudi volcanic scoria in lightweight geopolymer for enhanced wellbore cementing.

Idham K Rahmatullah, Abdulmalek Ahmed, Salaheldin Elkatatny, Ahmed M Abd El Fattah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Idham K RahmatullahDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulmalek AhmedDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia.
Salaheldin ElkatatnyDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia. elkatatny@kfupm.edu.sa.
Ahmed M Abd El FattahDepartment of Architecture, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geopolymer cement represents an innovative and environmentally friendly cement system that utilizes non-portlandite precursors to achieve cement hardening. Unlike traditional Portland cement, which accounts for approximately 5-8% of global CO₂ emissions, geopolymer cement offers a sustainable alternative. While its use has been widely adopted in construction projects, its application in wellbore cementing remains limited. Beyond reducing CO₂ emissions, geopolymer cement optimizes waste management by incorporating rock-based or industrial by-products rich in aluminosilicate content. In this study, Saudi volcanic scoria was developed as the primary binder for lightweight geopolymer wellbore cement. By varying the concentration of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) as an alkali activator from 15 to 40%, lightweight geopolymer cement was produced without the addition of external additives. The geopolymer cement sample containing the optimum concentration of NaOH was then used as a benchmark and compared to traditional Portland cement under identical conditions. Key variables such as mechanical strengths, rheological properties, free water, and sedimentation were analyzed. Experimental results demonstrated that volcanic scoria-based geopolymer cement with 20% NaOH achieved optimal performance, with the highest compressive and tensile strengths of 1798 psi and 73.9 psi, respectively. The results revealed that the geopolymer cement outperformed Portland cement in several aspects. For example, its compressive strength was 56% higher than that of Portland cement. Furthermore, the elastic properties of geopolymer cement were superior, with a 47% lower Young's modulus than Portland cement. Rheological evaluations indicated that geopolymer cement exhibited excellent pumpability and workability. Despite its plastic viscosity being higher than Portland cement, the geopolymer cement demonstrated 180%, 200%, and 336% higher yield points, 10-second gel strengths, and 10-minute gel strengths, respectively. Geopolymer cement performed exceptionally well in terms of stability, with 96% less free water and a 14% lower density variation than Portland cement. These findings highlight the potential of Saudi volcanic scoria as a primary binder in lightweight geopolymer cement. By applying the one-part method, the volcanic scoria-based geopolymer cement becomes a prospective environmentally friendly cement that can potentially be used in wellbore operations. It offers a viable solution that mitigates the carbon emissions while meeting the technical requirements for wellbore cementing applications.

Indexed as

GeopolymerPortland cementSustainabilityVolcanic scoriaWellbore cementing

Identifiers

PMID40595114
PMCPMC12215951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.