ArticleScientific reports2025
Influence of gender, limb dominance, training experience, and loading conditions on arch characteristics in badminton players.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foot arch structure is critical in athletic performance, load absorption, and injury prevention, particularly in high-intensity sports such as badminton. However, little is known about how gender, limb dominance, and training experience influence foot arch function under different loading conditions. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the effects of gender, limb dominance, training experience, and varying loads on Arch Height Index (AHI), Arch Stiffness Index (ASI), and Arch Height Flexibility (AHF) in university-level badminton players. A total of 50 players (35 males, 15 females) were assessed using the AHI Measurement System under five loading conditions (10% body weight seated, 20 kg, 40 kg, 50% body weight standing, 90% body weight single-leg stance). Arch height, arch stiffness, and arch height flexibility were calculated to evaluate static and dynamic arch characteristics. Results indicated significant reductions in arch height, arch stiffness, and arch height flexibility with increasing load. Female players exhibited significantly lower arch height than males across all loads, and training experience was associated with increased arch height and arch stiffness, especially in females. No consistent differences were observed based on limb dominance. These findings highlight the importance of considering gender and training experience in functional foot assessments and the design of sport-specific footwear. Further research is warranted to examine long-term adaptations of the foot arch in response to athletic training and its implications for performance and injury prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.