Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40595072›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A geophysical investigation of the fairy circles in Nebraska for geologic hydrogen exploration.

Mengli Zhang, Noah Perkovich, Yaoguo Li, Jessica Weihermann, R Nate Crummett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mengli ZhangCenter for Gravity, Electrical, and Magnetic Studies, Department of Geophysics, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, USA. menglizhang@mines.edu.
Noah PerkovichCenter for Gravity, Electrical, and Magnetic Studies, Department of Geophysics, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, USA.
Yaoguo LiCenter for Gravity, Electrical, and Magnetic Studies, Department of Geophysics, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, USA.
Jessica WeihermannCenter for Gravity, Electrical, and Magnetic Studies, Department of Geophysics, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, USA.
R Nate CrummettCenter for Gravity, Electrical, and Magnetic Studies, Department of Geophysics, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fairy circles are subcircular surface depression features that are widely distributed all over the world and they are commonly considered as a potential indicator to the presence of subsurface geologic hydrogen. Understanding the relationship between fairy circles and geological structures could assist in understanding potential hydrogen migration pathways and accumulations. We have carried out an integrated geophysical investigation over a group of such circles in the central U.S. We integrate digital elevation model (DEM), airborne gamma-ray spectrometry (AGRS) data, and ground electrical resistivity data to understand the connection between the surficial expressions and the underlying geology of the fairy circles. The study has shown that correlation between the locations of the fairy circles with either radiometric data or subsurface mafic or ultramafic rocks cannot be established. Meanwhile, the imaged geo-electrical structure within 500 m depth from the surface shows that the rim of the studied circle is directly above a ring of more resistive gap in a conductive layer. The low water saturation or lower salinity imaged by the high resistivity in this ring would allow the subsurface H2 to seep through more easily and, therefore, can explain the elevated H

Indexed as

Fairy circlesGeologic hydrogen explorationGeophysicsNebraska

Identifiers

PMID40595072
PMCPMC12216862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.