ArticleScientific reports2025
Diverse cultural backgrounds influence language aptitude and working memory in adult Chinese language learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous studies have discussed the most important factor limiting whether learners can achieve advanced language proficiency. For adults, language aptitude is one of the key factors; for children, it is primarily a matter of early and sustained language experience. However, this study shows that different early cultural backgrounds lead to various levels of linguistic aptitude when learning a foreign language in adulthood. For learners from Non-Chinese-character cultural circles (abbreviated as N4C), phonetic coding ability (PCA), one of the pure linguistic abilities, is the best predictor of Chinese listening proficiency, which can explain up to 51.8% of the difference in listening level. For learners from 4 C, both PCA and executive working memory (EWM), one of the general cognitive abilities, are the best predictors of listening proficiency. Together, they can explain about 41.5% of the difference in Chinese listening level. We speculate that in early stages of language acquisition, pure linguistic abilities are shaped easier than cognitive abilities. For adult learners, whether the native language they learned before the critical period and the foreign language they learned as adults belong to the same cultural circle may impact how well they use their pure linguistic abilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.