Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40595056›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Preoperative prediction of major adverse outcomes after total arch replacement in acute type A aortic dissection based on machine learning ensemble.

Hanshen Luo, Xinyi Liu, Yuehang Yang, Bing Tang, Pan He, Li Ding, Zhiwen Wang, Jiawei Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hanshen Luo *Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1277 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Xinyi Liu *Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Beijing Aortic Disease Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China.
Yuehang YangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1277 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Bing TangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Beijing Aortic Disease Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100029, China.
Pan HeDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Henan Provincial Chest Hospital (Chest Hospital of Zhengzhou University), Zhengzhou, 450003, China.
Li DingDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1277 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Zhiwen WangDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1277 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Jiawei ShiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1277 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430022, China. 15807298713@163.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82302378Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province 2023AFB205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A machine learning model was developed and validated to predict postoperative complications in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) who underwent total arch replacement combined with frozen elephant trunk (TAR + FET), with the goal of improving postoperative survival quality and guiding clinical treatment. We retrospectively analyzed data from 635 ATAAD patients who underwent TAR + FET surgery at our institution between January 2018 and October 2023. Based on the International Aortic Arch Surgery Study Group definition of Major Adverse Outcomes (MAO), the entire dataset was divided into 160 patients with MAO and 475 patients without MAO. We utilized 66 variables to train 190 machine learning models. The SHAP method identified 11 strong predictors to create a simplified model. We evaluated the predictive performance and clinical utility of both models using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, precision-recall curves (PRC), calibration plots, and clinical decision curves. The combination of Random Survival Forest (RSF) and Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) was identified as the best predictive model. Both the full model and the simplified model achieved an area under the ROC curve above 0.85 and an area under the PRC curve above 0.703. The Brier values for the simplified model's calibration outcomes in the training and validation sets were 0.124 and 0.138, respectively, with a clinical utility risk threshold probability range of 0.2 to 0.9. A web-based simplified prediction model was developed (https://pmodel.shinyapps.io/pmodel/), enabling the prediction of complication risk in ATAAD patients undergoing TAR + FET surgery, thereby guiding clinical treatment decisions. The combination model of RSF and GBM effectively predicts the risk of postoperative complications in ATAAD patients, helping surgeons identify high-risk individuals and implement personalized perioperative management.

Indexed as

Aorta, ThoracicAortic DissectionBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationMachine LearningPostoperative ComplicationsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveTreatment OutcomeMachine learningMajor adverse outcomePostoperative complicationsPredictive modelType A aortic dissection

Identifiers

PMID40595056
PMCPMC12216771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.