Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40595051›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Dog facial landmarks detection and its applications for facial analysis.

George Martvel, Anna Zamansky, Giulia Pedretti, Chiara Canori, Ilan Shimshoni, Annika Bremhorst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

George MartvelUniversity of Haifa, Haifa, Israel. martvelge@gmail.com.
Anna ZamanskyUniversity of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Giulia PedrettiUniversity of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Chiara CanoriUniversity of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Ilan ShimshoniUniversity of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Annika BremhorstDogs and Science, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 3_220607 / 1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated analysis of facial expressions is a crucial challenge in the emerging field of animal affective computing. One of the most promising approaches in this context is facial landmarks, which are well-studied for humans and are now being adopted for many non-human species. The scarcity of high-quality, comprehensive datasets is a significant challenge in the field. This paper is the first to present a novel Dog Facial Landmarks in the Wild (DogFLW) dataset containing 3732 images of dogs annotated with facial landmarks and bounding boxes. Our facial landmark scheme has 46 landmarks grounded in canine facial anatomy, the Dog Facial Action Coding System (DogFACS), and informed by existing cross-species landmarking methods. We additionally provide a benchmark for dog facial landmarks detection and demonstrate two case studies for landmark detection models trained on the DogFLW. The first is a pipeline using landmarks for emotion classification from dog facial expressions from video, and the second is the recognition of DogFACS facial action units (variables), which can enhance the DogFACS coding process by reducing the time needed for manual annotation. The DogFLW dataset aims to advance the field of animal affective computing by facilitating the development of more accurate, interpretable, and scalable tools for analysing facial expressions in dogs with broader potential applications in behavioural science, veterinary practice, and animal-human interaction research.

Indexed as

FaceFacial ExpressionAnimalsDogsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAnimal emotion recognitionAnimalFACSDogFACSFacial action unitsFacial landmarksMovement detection

Identifiers

PMID40595051
PMCPMC12218811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.