ArticleScientific reports2025
Potential role of avibactam in restoring susceptibility in Escherichia coli with two copies of bla
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Fivefold Maximum Drug-Likeness Strategy for Prioritizing Antibacterial Candidates AgainstPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Identification of Antibacterial Hits Associated with Penicillin-Binding Protein 2 inDrug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The emergence of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales represents a significant clinical challenge. Resistance mechanisms involve carbapenemase production, porin and efflux pump alterations, penicillin-binding protein (PBP) modifications, and biofilm formation. This study characterizes a KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and a concurrent Escherichia coli isolate harboring the same resistance genes, with E. coli also exhibiting PBP3 mutations. Whole-genome sequencing and plasmid analysis identified an IncFII(K) plasmid carrying the blaKPC-3 gene. Both strains shared two resistance genes (blaKPC-3, blaOXA-9). K. pneumoniae contained a single copy of blaKPC-3 on Tn4401a, whereas E. coli carried two copies on separate Tn4401a transposons. Plasmid reconstruction revealed high homology (99.85%) with E. coli plasmid pECAZ147_KPC and K. pneumoniae plasmid pKPC. This suggests that transposon-mediated blaKPC-3 transfer between the two strains may have occurred via the same plasmid. Moreover, E. coli harbored PBP3 mutations (A233T, I332V), which have been previously linked to increased ceftazidime MICs and two missense mutations in marR. Despite carrying two copies of the blaKPC-3 gene, along with marR and PBP3 mutations, our E. coli isolate did not exhibit a significant increase in ceftazidime/avibactam MIC. This phenomenon could be explained by avibactam’s ability to bind to E. coli PBP2, potentially compensating for the reduced binding of ceftazidime to the mutated PBP3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.