ArticleScientific reports2025
Analysis of Z-Score and total score of athleticism on drafted and undrafted players from the NFL scouting combine.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-precision prediction method for mine deformation based on GNSS RTK and stacking ensemble learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Legalization dilemma and solution of China's professional sports league governance.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of z-score and Total Score Athleticism (TSA) in distinguishing between drafted and undrafted NFL players, with a focus on different positional groups. We analyzed NFL Scouting Combine data (2000-2024) using z-score and TSA calculated for both the entire sample and specific positional groups (Skill player, big skill player and linemen), with a final sample of 3,446 players included after filtering. Examine the differences between drafted and undrafted players, as well as the differences among the three positional groups. The classification accuracy was evaluated by ROC analysis and binary logistic regression. Significant differences were observed in z-scores (P < 0.001) and TSA (P < 0.001) between drafted and undrafted players under the two calculation methods across all positions, with drafted players generally outperforming undrafted ones. ROC analysis indicated that all z-scores on NFL SC demonstrate good performance (AUC > 0.6, P < 0.001). Z-score for the 40-yard dash provided the highest AUC (0.637-0.719), while the bench press lowest (0.556-0.631). Position-specific z-score and TSA calculations showed better discriminatory performance compared to the calculation based on the overall sample. This study confirms that both z-scores and TSA are effective in differentiating drafted from undrafted players, with position-specific calculations offering enhanced discriminatory power. The results underscore the importance of tailoring athletic assessments to specific positional needs to improve talent identification. Coaches can understand how z-scores and TSA can be used on National Football League Scouting Combine, and these metrics perform across various positions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.