Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40595000›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Deep learning-driven drug response prediction and mechanistic insights in cancer genomics.

Guili Yu, Qiangqiang Fan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Guili Yu *Pujiang Community Health Service Center, Shanghai, China.
Qiangqiang Fan *Pujiang People Institute, Shanghai, China. dongliulou@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the field of cancer therapy, the diversity and heterogeneity of cancer genomes in clinical patients complicate and challenge the effective use of non-targeted drugs, as these drugs often fail to address specific genetic events. Recent advancements in large-scale in vitro drug screening assays have generated extensive drug testing and genomic data, providing valuable resources to explore the relationship between genomic features and drug responses. In this study, we developed a deep neural network model, DrugS (Drug Response prediction Utilizing Genomic features Screening), utilizing gene expression and drug testing data from human-derived cancer cell lines to predict cellular responses to drugs. Leveraging gene expression and mutation data, we elucidated potential molecular mechanisms underlying SN-38 resistance. Additionally, we used DrugS to evaluate the effects of drugs on cancer cell proliferation in patient-derived xenograft models. In in vitro combination drug experiments, DrugS revealed that CDK inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors, and apoptosis inhibitors effectively reverse Ibrutinib resistance, providing new therapeutic strategies to overcome drug resistance. Furthermore, we assessed the applicability of the DrugS model in drug screening and patient prognosis evaluation using drug information and gene expression data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. In summary, our study offers a novel approach for drug response prediction and mechanism research in cancer therapy from a genomic perspective and demonstrates the potential applications of the DrugS model in personalized therapy and resistance mechanism elucidation.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDeep LearningGenomicsNeoplasmsAdenineAnimalsApoptosisCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationDrug Resistance, NeoplasmGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMicePiperidinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAdenineAntineoplastic AgentsibrutinibPiperidinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsNeural network modelingOncogenomic profilingPharmacogenomicsPrecision oncologyTherapeutic resistance

Identifiers

PMID40595000
PMCPMC12216877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.