ArticleScientific reports2025
Monitoring and predicting cotton leaf diseases using deep learning approaches and mathematical models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A hybrid SE-ResNet50 deep learning framework for high-accuracy and explainable cotton leaf disease classification.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- An attention enhanced CNN ensemble for interpretable and accurate cotton leaf disease classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cotton, the backbone of global textile production, demands sustainable agricultural practices to ensure fiber, food, and environmental security. Cotton crop play an essential role in farming economies; however, production is sometimes affected by various diseases that harm production. We proposed a methodology that uses formal modeling and verification for requirements confirmation to improve the monitoring and detection of cotton crop diseases. The correct information and requirements about disease symptoms can improve disease monitoring and prediction. The Temporal Logic of Action (TLA+) is used to construct a mathematical model to verify requirements by providing disease symptoms and then model checking to ensure correctness properties. Using model checking in TLA + ensures the reliability and correctness of disease symptom detection. We consequently used deep learning models to predict cotton diseases, i.e., Aphids, Armyworms, Bacterial Blight, Powdery Mildew, Target Spot, and Healthy leaf. Our results show that the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model achieved an overall accuracy of 98.7% with class-specific accuracy ranging from with F1-scores across all classes (e.g., 0.90 for Powdery Mildew and 0.87 for Army Worm).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.