ArticleScientific reports2025
Semi-automated screening of azobezenes for solar energy storage using extended tight binding methods.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- GFN1-xTB-Assisted Machine Learning for Electronic Structure Screening of Metal-Organic Frameworks.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the face of the pressing climate change crisis, Molecular Solar Thermal Energy Storage (MOST) Systems offer a promising avenue for efficient energy storage. This study focuses on the potential of systems based on azobenzene and gives a comprehensive framework for assessing unique azobenzene variations for MOST applications. A high-throughput screening process, underpinned by semi-empirical extended tight binding methods, has been developed to enable exploration of the vast chemical space of azobenzenes. The codebase for the established screening procedure, including methodologies and tools, is organized and shared through a GitHub repository ensuring transparency and reproducibility. We test our high throughput screening procedure on 37,729 azobenzene derivatives and highlight that it is robust enough to facilitate subsequent studies that will dive deeper into the potential of azobenzenes in MOST applications. Future endeavors will focus on expanding the dataset, correlating energies with higher-level calculations, and harnessing advanced statistical and machine learning techniques to optimize the selection and performance of azobenzenes in MOST systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.