Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594957›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparison of the simplest diets to find the most effective one in developing ant colonies of Lasius niger.

Norbert Szabó, Jenő Nagy, András Tartally

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Norbert SzabóDepartment of Evolutionary Zoology and Human Biology, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary.
Jenő NagyHUN-REN-UD Conservation Biology Research Group, Department of Botany, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary.
András TartallyDepartment of Evolutionary Zoology and Human Biology, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, Debrecen, H-4032, Hungary. tartally.andras@science.unideb.hu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nurturing, especially feeding ant colonies is a vital topic among ant researchers and ant keepers. Numerous factors contribute to growing healthy ant colonies rapidly, including, for instance, humidity levels and appropriate farming methods. Proper diet is also an essential consideration. Many articles contemplate the potential of artificial diets. Variable carbohydrate-based diets have been tested but the role of protein has largely been overlooked. We aimed to analyse the effects of these diets to be able to standardize and compare results of different laboratories. We assessed the most readily available, natural, inexpensive, known, and efficient diets to ensure optimal nutrition for ant colonies by analysing the development of 100 Lasius niger colonies. They were given four different carbohydrate-based diets in the first year and four different protein-based diets in the second year. Based on our findings, honey water was the best carbohydrate source. The best protein diet, however, consisted of crickets, which positively influenced not only the development but also the survival success of the colonies during the wintering period. Thus, we suggest rearing laboratory colonies of L. niger on honey water and crickets. It would be worth repeating this study with different ant species and doing biochemical analysis on the diets.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAntsDietAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietary CarbohydratesDietary ProteinsHoneyDietary CarbohydratesDietary ProteinsBlack garden antCockroachCricketHibernationHoneyMealwormSucroseWintering

Identifiers

PMID40594957
PMCPMC12214729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.