ArticleScientific reports2025
Research on the centre of gravity after "Transfer-Conversion-Changes" in different land use types during 2010-2020.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the spatiotemporal evolution and spatial correlation network characteristics of cultivated land carbon emissions in China.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Spatiotemporal differentiation and coupling mechanisms between vegetation and ecological water demand in a typical arid region of Xinjiang, China.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Land use change has had a crucial impact on ecological and socioeconomic systems. This study takes the main urban area of Zhengzhou as an example and constructs a comprehensive analysis framework based on the "transfer-conversion-change" centroid model, which precisely illustrates the trends of urban land use change from 2010 to 2020. The results indicate that: I. From 2010 to 2020, the area of building land, forest land, and grassland continuously increased, while cultivated land decreased significantly. II. Spatial migration characteristics showed southwestward centroid shifts in building land, forest land, cultivated land, unused land, and water bodies. III. Dynamic conversion processes revealed divergent trajectories: forest land conversion drove northeastward centroid migration, while transitions of building land and grassland predominantly shifted southward, contrasting with the northward movement observed in cultivated land, unused land, and water body conversions. IV. Post-change aggregation patterns exhibited regional clustering, with grassland, cultivated land, and unused land centroids shifting northwest, forest and water areas moving southwest, and building land migrating northeast. This study established an integrated analytical framework through the centroid model, expanding its application in land use change analysis and addressing theoretical gaps in quantifying interactions between land use types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.