ArticleScientific reports2025
RareNet: a deep learning model for rare cancer diagnosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-cancer survival prediction using machine learning models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cancer and Aging Biomarkers: Classification, Early Detection Technologies and Emerging Research Trends.Biosensors · 2025Review
- DNA methylation and machine learning: challenges and perspective toward enhanced clinical diagnostics.Clinical epigenetics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although significant advances have been made in the early detection of many cancers, challenges remain in the early diagnosis of rare cancers, including Wilms tumor, Clear Cell Sarcoma of the Kidney, Neuroblastoma, Osteosarcoma, and Acute Myeloid Leukemia, perhaps due to their relative obscurity and scarce data compared to common cancers. Application of artificial intelligence or deep learning has shown promising results in disease diagnosis including in their ability to diagnose cancers and detect their tissue of origin. However, their ability to detect rare cancers is yet to be comprehensively assessed. This motivated us to develop, RareNet, which leverages transfer learning of an established deep learning model, namely, CancerNet, to classify rare cancers. The transfer learning framework of RareNet utilized DNA methylation data of various biopsied rare cancers to learn epigenetic signatures of rare cancers. RareNet achieved an overall accuracy (F1 score) of ~ 96%, outperforming other machine learning models including Random Forest, K Nearest Neighbors, Decision Tree Classifier, and Support Vector Classifier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.