Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40594922›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Generative AI for weakly supervised segmentation and downstream classification of brain tumors on MR images.

Jay J Yoo, Khashayar Namdar, Matthias W Wagner, Kristen W Yeom, Liana F Nobre, Uri Tabori, Cynthia Hawkins, Birgit B Ertl-Wagner, Farzad Khalvati

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jay J YooUniversity of Toronto, Institute of Medical Science, Toronto, M5S 1A8, Canada.
Khashayar NamdarUniversity of Toronto, Institute of Medical Science, Toronto, M5S 1A8, Canada.
Matthias W WagnerDepartment of Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, M5G 1X8, Canada.
Kristen W YeomDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, 94305, USA.
Liana F NobreDivision of Hematology/Oncology (iHOPE), Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 1C9, Canada.
Uri TaboriDivision of Hematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, M5G 1X8, Canada.
Cynthia HawkinsDevelopmental and Stem Cell Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, M5G 1X8, Canada.
Birgit B Ertl-WagnerDepartment of Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, M5G 1X8, Canada.
Farzad KhalvatiUniversity of Toronto, Institute of Medical Science, Toronto, M5S 1A8, Canada. farzad.khalvati@utoronto.ca.

Funding

CIHR Funding Reference Number: 184015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segmenting abnormalities is a leading problem in medical imaging. Using machine learning for segmentation generally requires manually annotated segmentations, demanding extensive time and resources from radiologists. We propose a weakly supervised approach that utilizes binary image-level labels, which are much simpler to acquire, rather than manual annotations to segment brain tumors on magnetic resonance images. The proposed method generates healthy variants of cancerous images for use as priors when training the segmentation model. However, using weakly supervised segmentations for downstream tasks such as classification can be challenging due to occasional unreliable segmentations. To address this, we propose using the generated non-cancerous variants to identify the most effective segmentations without requiring ground truths. Our proposed method generates segmentations that achieve Dice coefficients of 79.27% on the Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) 2020 dataset and 73.58% on an internal dataset of pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG), which increase to 88.69% and 80.29%, respectively, when removing suboptimal segmentations identified using the proposed method. Using the segmentations for tumor classification results with Area Under the Characteristic Operating Curve (AUC) of 93.54% and 83.74% on the BraTS and pLGG datasets, respectively. These are comparable to using manual annotations which achieve AUCs of 95.80% and 83.03% on the BraTS and pLGG datasets, respectively.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingSupervised Machine LearningAlgorithmsChildHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID40594922
PMCPMC12214810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.