ArticleScientific reports2025
Determination of bisphenol A in different types of soft drink samples by MSPE-GC/MS technique and contribution to risk assessment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Migration of Bisphenol A (BPA) into PET-Bottled Beverages: A Comprehensive Review and Bibliometric Analysis.Toxics · 2026Review
- Integrated assessment of drinking water quality and child nitrate health risk using indices and Monte Carlo simulation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Efficient magnetic sorbent for extracting bisphenol A from aqueous samples.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Determination of bisphenol a in doogh (a yogurt-based Iranian drink) by magnetic-SPE (MWCNT-FeScientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bisphenol A (BPA) is a chemical used in the production of plastics (polycarbonate) that can pose risks to human health. This research aimed to evaluate contents of BPA in soft drink samples (samples packaged in different containers and different volumes) by MSPEGC/MS (Magnetic Solid-Phase Extraction-Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry) technique. Moreover, health risks of human were assessed for Iranian consumers by MCS method. Our results revealed, the average level of BPA in all samples was 1.83 ± 1.16 ppb (ranging from 0.45 to 5.10 ppb). BPA levels differed significantly among the samples depending on the type of packaging and pH level (P < 0.05). Also, the highest and lowest average levels of BPA in different soft drinks of different flavours/tastes were in cola soft drink samples (2.53 ppb) and energy drink samples (0.85 ppb), respectively. Furthermore, the highest and lowest average levels of BPA in soft drinks with different volumes were observed in 1500 cc soft drink samples (2.87 ppb) and 500 mL soft drink samples (0.9 ppb), respectively. The results of the MCS (Monte Carlo Simulation) indicated the 95th percentile for the THQ (Target Hazard Quotient) of BPA in soft drink samples was 9.61E + 1 for adults and 1.37E + 2 for children (6 years) (THQ > 1). Overall, these results imply that exposure to BPA could represent a potential health risk for individuals who frequently consume soft drinks packaged in PET (Polyethylene Terephthalate) or cans, especially for children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.