ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of different spectral indices for wheat lodging assessment using machine learning algorithms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wheat lodging is a recurrent phenomenon that significantly affects grain yield and impedes the harvesting efficiency. Therefore, the precise and rapid assessment of wheat lodging is crucial in minimizing its impact on grain yield and quality. Recently few studies related to machine learning based wheat lodging have been reported; however, the literature still lacks comprehensive assessments of machine learning algorithms for wheat lodging over Indian agricultural fields. This study presented a systematic approach for detecting the wheat lodging occurred during the end of March and April 2023 in the Ludhiana district of Punjab (India) from multi-temporal Sentinel-2 data using the machine learning algorithms. The ground control points for healthy and lodged areas were collected during March and April 2023. The temporal characteristics of crop phenology from November 2022 to April 2023 were analyzed for wheat classification. The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) was computed during this period followed by implementation of random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), and support vector machine (SVM) algorithms to evaluate their performance for wheat classification. It was found that RF outperformed the other models in terms of prediction accuracy and wheat area extraction. To distinguish between lodged and non-lodged wheat, eight spectral indices were computed from the visible and infrared bands of Sentinel-2. These indices were used as inputs to RF, DT, and SVM models. The optimal set of features were identified using random forest feature importance selection approach. Among the spectral indices, spectral sum index (SSI) derived from blue, green, red, and near-infrared bands followed by generalized difference vegetation index (GDVI) accurately separated lodged wheat from non-lodged wheat. Among the three algorithms, the RF model combined with SSI and GDVI achieved the highest overall accuracy of 89.2%. These results suggested that SSI and GDVI derived from Sentinel-2 data coupled with random forest model is effective for assessing the wheat lodging on spatio-temporal scale which may be helpful for developing the decision support system to assess the loss of crop yield loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.